- Page 1
-
Supreme Court Expands ERISA's Equitable Remedies in CIGNA v. Amara Amara, ERISA, equitable remedies, monetary damages -
Bloomberg Markets: "ERISA Exploits Consumers!" Bloomberg Markets examines how ERISA, a statute meant to protect consumers, actually exploints consumers -
Insurers Have to Use the Correct Criteria in Evaluating Medical Necessity It is an abuse of discretion to use the wrong criteria in evaluating the medical necessity of treatment for insurance purposes. -
Testimony Before The Senate Finance Committee The U.S. Senate Finance Committee conducts a hearing on the illusory promises of long term disability insurance policies -
Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Ins. Plan An important U.S. Circuit court decision regarding the availability of discovery in ERISA benefit cases where a conflict of interest exists. -
ERISA Bonds ERISA bonding requirements are complex. Here's some information about it. -
Delayed Claim for Prosthetic Leg ERISA, delayed payment of insurance claim, prosthetic leg, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield -
I Thought I Was Irritated By Conkright . . . . Conkright v. Frommert -
Conkright v. Frommert Conkright v. FrommertLLast
Articles
- Posted on 05/17/2011 CIGNA v. Amara
- Posted on 03/29/2011 Bloomberg Markets' article on ERISA
- Posted on 12/24/2010 James F. v. CIGNA Behavioral Health Inc.
News
- Posted on 07/11/2019 Timothy D. v. Aetna Health and Life Ins. Co.
- Posted on 06/24/2019 Family says insurance fails to pay for mental health coverage despite medical necessity
- Posted on 04/24/2006 Eliminating Discretionary Clauses in Insurance Policies