I don't think that every grievance a person or entity has should end up in court or that, being in court, every dispute should end up going to the judge or jury for decision. But there are many disputes that need to be presented to an impartial finder of fact for resolution. The right to take grievances to court is constitutionally guaranted. I sometimes think that with so many whining about the supposed over-lawyering of our society (think Philip K. Howard), we lose sight of the importance of the courthouse doors being open.
There's a remarkable positive correlation between large business interests and efforts to restrict or close the court house doors to regular people. As Dahlia Lithwick suggests, the solution to most of our problems is not less regulation or oversight. Especially in light of our recent home mortgage and financial meltdown, we should be thinking about how to ensure greater, not less, accountability from the corporate and government institutions that have such a huge impact on our day-to-day lives. Kvetching about some moron who thinks he's entitled to millions when the dry cleaners lose a pair of his pants may be fun among friends. However, it hardly serves as a helpful example of the significant challenges we face in protecting the rights and assets of regular people in our society. Idiosyncratic, greedy or egomaniacal cranks in our society who occasionally abuse the legal system have always been, and always will, be with us. But it's beyond doubt that there are bigger, more systematic, abuses in our society we should be concerned about.
- Posted on 09/24/2010 Testimony of Judge William Acker Before Senate Finance Committee
- Posted on 09/18/2010 DeBofsky Senate Testimony
- Posted on 01/05/2010 Preliminary Injunction in C/HCA, et. al., v. Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Utah